2. Where do you get your news? All over the place. Danish, British, German and American newspapers, Danish National Radio and an assortment of online sources, like The Register or Indymedia.

3. Are you involved in any online communities? I write small news bulletins and blog for a small local paper.

4. What sorts of issues do you care about? Heavy stuff – politics, law, economics, science and that sort of thing. On the lighter side I like to write about literature.

5. How often do you visit this site? Probably weekly. But I haven’t known about this site for that long.

6. How did you first hear about Wikileads? Googlesearching wikileaks and the likes.

7. What do you like about the content of this site? The following up on leaks and lawmakers’ acts, adding to transparency. Reading about things I wouldn’t see in a mainstream media news source.

8. What do you think could be improved? Perhaps less emphasis on WikiLeaks as such, and more about whistleblowing and disclosures in general.

9. Which of the following would you prefer: See question 8.

#2: Where do you get your news?
From the internet *only*. It is the only place for news that I really trust any more.

#3: Are you involved in any online communities?
No.

#4: What sorts of issues do you care about?
SECRETS. When a government is completely open with it’s people, it is difficult for it to be corrupt. When a government decides to be corrupt, of course it will try to be as secretive about it as possible. The american government as it is right now is one of the most secretive and corrupt governments in existence right now. Since they (among other governments of the world) will not tell us what is really going on, places like wikileaks has to do it for them.

#5: How often do you visit this site?
Once a week probably.

#6: How did you first hear about Wikileads?
I think there was a link to it from wikileaks.

#7: What do you like about the content of this site?
I think of wikileaks kind of like raw data, and wikileads manages it in to a more readable format.

#8: What do you think could be improved?
Nothing really. I do not need tons of pictures like the other people seem to, unless the actual pictures are relevant to the story, for example, pictures that governments do not want released or some thing. But if it is an article on some thing like oil or some thing, I do not need pictures of oil barrels in the article, any one can look up those type of pictures if they want to.

#9: Which of the following would you prefer?
WIKILEAKS only. That is only my opinion of course. But like I said before, I kind of use wikileads instead of having to sift through every thing on wikileaks. Although I still like to read the whole wikileaks article in some thing I am interested it.

Other comments:
I am very cynical when it comes to things like governments, money, power, corruption, secrets, et cetera. I think very many people are actually finding out about lots of corruption around the world. One of the biggest reasons that we know so much is because of the mostly-unregulated nature of the internet. Do you think any mass-media would televise the kind of stuff on wikileaks?? Also, despite that there have been countless movies made that reveal many deep secrets, none (I think) have ever been televised. This is because the mass-media and the governments are best friends. If you have not seen any of these movies, I would start with Zeitgeist (the best one in my opinion); you can watch it right on their website. It talks about things like 9/11, RFID chips, North American Union (trying to merge canada, united states, and mexico in to one country), and basically how we are paying for our own slavery and do not even realized it. It makes you realize that some thing needs to be done very soon…..but in my opinion, probably will not.