Site menu:

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

 

June 2008
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Archives

Site search

Subscribe

The higher moral code of Wikileaks and whistleblowing

Posted June 1st, 2008

Check out this fascinating article about Wikileaks from the Toronto Globe and Mail. The article’s writer, Ivor Tossell, discusses Wikileaks in the grand sense — what the site means for governments, dissidents and the Internet, and how the group’s legal invincibility and pro-citizen moral code have allowed it to take full advantage of the Internet age.

Some of Tossell’s conclusions:

  • Wikileaks is one of the first fully post-national organizations produced during the Internet age. Meaning Wikileaks operates outside the legal, geographical and technological constraints of any one country (or any group of countries). It makes its own rules, based on its own moral code, and it has set itself up so that no single nation can shut it down.
  • Wikileaks is agnostic to law, or at least to the laws created by nations. To Wikileaks, what seems to matter is a higher moral code, based on individual rights and the idea that governments should belong to the governed.
  • Individual privacy matters to Wikileaks. The privacy of corporations, governments and individuals committing criminal or immoral acts — acts that harm other individuals — does not deserve protection.
  • Transparency trumps secrecy. There’s almost no such thing as a legitimate government secret, according to Wikileaks. Governments are in place to serve the people they govern. When citizens know what their governments are up to, governments are less likely to do hugely stupid things.

Interesting stuff. Definitely worth reading.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Comments

Comment from Ethics Whistler
Time: July 22, 2008, 3:32 pm

Interesting post. I was just reading an article in The Washington Post about a lawsuit which is questioning the constitutionality of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires publicly traded organizations to establish a process to manage whistleblower complaints. According to the Post, it seems likely that the Public company Accounting Oversight Board, who created the act, will lose their case. This could have an interesting affect on federal whistleblowing regulations and technologies, so it should be an interesting story to keep your eye on.

Write a comment





Powered by WP Hashcash